Legal Opinion
Bramall v. Wales
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 18, 1981No. 8185-3-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff, Wilma Bramall, appearing pro se, appeals from a judgment dismissing her complaint and awarding damages to defendants, Hugh Gregory Wales, et al (Wales), on their counterclaim. We affirm the judgment as modified.
On February 21, 1978, Bramall filed an amended complaint seeking damages for "interference, invasion of privacy, slander of credit and title, breach [of] contract, and intent to do bodily harm." Wales was duly served outside the state of Washington, pursuant to RCW 4.28.180 and 4.28.185. Wales filed an answer and counterclaim seeking damages for defamation.
In the summer of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- Clausing v. DeHartWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Cutter v. CUTTER REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Odom v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Howland v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Warfel v. BradyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Hamilton v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- City of Bellevue v. Pine Forest Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Hamilton v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Cottages At The Heights Condo Owners Assoc. v. Jayakrishnan K. Nair, Et AnoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.