Thomas W. Hill v. Department of the Air Force Paul J. Vallerie, and Paul S. Britt
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant Paul S. Britt appeals from the October 31, 1988, order of the district court denying Britt’s motion to quash a notice of lis pendens placed by plaintiff Thomas W. Hill on Britt’s residence. Hill has filed a motion to dismiss alleging this court does not have jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Britt has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hamilton v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. ParrettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Orange County, California Airport Hotel Associates, a California Limited Partnership v. The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jones v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Jones v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.