Norkin v. Hoey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ellerin, J.
The issue before us is whether petitioners-respondents, David Norkin and Britestarr Homes, Inc. (Britestarr), may challenge a subpoena duces tecum served upon Lloyd’s Bank PLC (Lloyd’s) for production of bank records relating to a loan made by Lloyd’s to Britestarr, a New York corporation of which Norkin is the president and sole stockholder.
A subpoena duces tecum was served upon Lloyd’s in the context of an investigation conducted by the Department of Investigation of the City of New York (DOI) of the City’s Department of Sanitation regarding its issuance of a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. WalkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sussman v. New York State Organized Crime Task ForceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Graney Development Corp. v. TaksenNew York Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bonnie & Co. Fashions, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Oncor Communications v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Oncor Communications, Inc. v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. HarrisCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2012
- People v. LommaNew York Supreme Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.