Legal Opinion
People v. Harris
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided April 20, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Matthew A. Sciarrino, Jr., J.
The New York County District Attorney’s Office seeks to obtain the #Twitter records of @destructuremal using a #1 *615subpoena. The defendant is alleged to have participated in a #OWS protest march on October 1, 2011. The defendant, Malcolm Harris, along with several hundred other protesters, were charged with disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20 [5]) after allegedly marching on to the roadway of the Brooklyn Bridge. The defendant moved to #quash that subpoena. That motion is #denied.
On January 26, 2012, the People sent a subpoena duces tecum to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Guest v. LeisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- People v. Di RaffaeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HarrisCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2012
- Fawcett v. AltieriNew York Supreme Court · 2013