Legal Opinion

Genaro v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2003No. S-10681PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court granted summary judgment to the Municipality of Anchorage on claims filed by pro se litigant Brenda Genaro, based on her deemed admissions stemming from her failure to respond to the Municipality's requests for admissions. Genaro had opposed summary judgment on the ground that she believed the Municipality had already received the requested information from the bankruptcy trustee who had briefly been substituted for her as the real party in interest in the case. Because we conclude that it was an abuse of discretion not to give…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bauman v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Kaiser v. SakataAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Willoya v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Collins v. Arctic BuildersAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Snyder v. American Legion Spenard Post No. 28Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Pedersen v. BlytheAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Azimi v. JohnsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Bush v. ElkinsAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hartman v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API