Legal Opinion
Powell v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 5, 1929No. 1 Div. 538PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The suit is for construction of will and for a sale of real property and division of proceeds among joint owners.
The former decision, reported as Rutland v. Emanuel, 202 Ala. 269,80 So. 107, arose over contest as to income from the lands made the subject of this suit. It was declared that the son of testatrix, Mr. Edward Emanuel, and his wife surviving him, had successive life estates in said property, and that the power of appointment contained in the mother's…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- George Johnston's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Patton v. BeecherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Braley v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Harkins & Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.