Legal Opinion

Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1931No. 1 Div. 624PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The Code, § 10593, has the effect of preventing the husband against the dissent of the wife from making provision for her different from her dower rights and distributive share. Her failure to dissent amounts to a forfeiture of such rights. Therefore an agreement on her part, made with her husband prior to bis death, in effect that she will not dissent but will accept the provisions of the will, is virtually an agreement that she thereby foregoes her dower and distributive share in his estate in consideration of the XDrovisions of the will.

The rule was stated at an early date in Alabama, and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Dunn v. VinyardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Martin's Heirs v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Webb v. Webb's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  4. Gould v. WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  5. Burroughs v. Pacific Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hartt v. HarttWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In re the Estate of ZweigNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. Callie L. Cox and B. C. Cox, Jr., as Executors Under the Will of B. C. Cox, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Ivey v. Dixon Investment CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. Allison v. StevensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API