Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hines

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 22, 1929No. 12619PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

March 22, 1929. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This action by the plaintiff, D.R. Martin, was commenced in the Court of Common Pleas for Greenville County, August 12, 1925, against the defendants, Fred Hines, Waller Bailey and Jack Brown, for damages for injuries received by the plaintiff growing out of an automobile collision alleged to have been caused by the defendants. In their answer all of the defendants denied liability. The case was tried at the February, 1927, term of Court of Common Pleas for said County of Greenville, before his Honor, Judge J.W. De Vore, and a jury. At…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. Columbia Ry., G. E. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Pendleton v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. Sloan v. Seaboard & Roanoke Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  4. McKenzie v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  5. Fennell v. WoodwardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burst v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. Forrest v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1937
  3. Boyd v. MaxwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Fleming v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. Landreth v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API