Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Southern Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided October 5, 1937No. 2657PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYCHE, District Judge.

This matter is before me upon motion of plaintiff to remand the case to the court of common pleas for Greenwood county, S. C., from whence it was removed upon the petition of the Southern Railway Company upon the grounds of separable controversy and fraudulent joinder.

The action is one for the recovery of damages against the defendants for the death of plaintiff’s intestate which occurred at a railway crossing in a collision of a freight train of the Southern Railway Company and the automobile in which plaintiff’s intestate was riding, and is alleged to have been caused…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. Columbia Ry., G. E. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Pendleton v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. Lynes v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1924
  4. Martin v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  5. McKenzie v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacks v. Torrington CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
  2. Good v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1941
  3. United States v. SloanDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1940
  4. Barfield v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1942
  5. Bagwell v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API