Legal Opinion

State v. Spicer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1981No. 8023SC596PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendants’ first assignment of error focuses on several instances during trial when the trial judge either questioned witnesses about their testimony or commented about testimony. Defendants contend that by this action, the trial judge erroneously expressed an opinion in the presence of the jury. We have carefully examined the record with respect to this assignment and find no prejudicial conduct on the part of the trial judge.

Defendants next make several assignments of error based upon an offer of charge reduction made by the district attorney to Henry A. Minton for the purpose…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. WrennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. HaightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API