Legal Opinion

State v. Owens

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1983No. 8313SC227PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant argues the trial judge erred in failing to grant his motion to dismiss at the close of the evidence. A motion to dismiss tests the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury and is properly denied if there is substantial evidence of all material elements of the offense charged. State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95, 261 S.E. 2d 114 (1980). The evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the state, giving it the benefit of all reasonable inferences which can be drawn from the evidence. Id.

In the case at bar, the evidence taken in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. HedgepethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. Gayton-BarbosaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. SuggsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API