Snyder v. City Bond & Finance Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BEAUMONT, J., pro tem.
This is an action based on fraud. The kind of fraud relied upon is that defined in subdivision 4, section 1572, of the Civil Code as “a promise made without any intention of performing it. ’ ’ In his complaint, with other allegations, plaintiff stated in substance that he owned certain shares of the capital stock of the Standard Oil Company of California and of Armour & Company; that defendant, for the purpose of defrauding plaintiff, promised plaintiff that if he would indorse and deliver said stock to defendant, it would pay a certain indebtedness of $2,83-2 for which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Boyle v. Coast Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Tench v. McMeekanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Holiday v. TolosanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Tranchina v. ArcinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Union FM v. Southern Cal. FMCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Wilson v. Rigali & VeselichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Longway v. NewberyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.