Cameron v. Fellows
Supreme Court of Iowa
Henry Potratz was accused of contempt of court in violating a decree permanently enjoining him from maintaining a liquor nuisance in the Thirteenth judicial district of Iowa. On hearing, he was discharged, and thereupon a writ of certiorari sued out.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
A statement of consent to the sale of intoxicating liquors in Winneshiek county, signed by more than 65 per cent, of the voters who- cast their ballot at the general election of 1896, was filed with the county auditor May lf 1897. Due notice of the intention of the board of supervisory to canvass such statement at its January, 1898, session, was!given, and on January 7th of that year this record was made:
“The board then took up the canvass of the liquor petition, completing the same, aftei finding the result to be as-follows:
Townships. Voters. Signers.
Bloomfield. 278 214-
Military .270 321
Wash.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barton v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Bartel v. HobsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Gipps Brewing Co. v. De FranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- State v. ViersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- State v. SnyderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jones v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Cheadle v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Wells v. District Court of Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Campbell Baking Co. v. City of Harrisonville, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Carter v. BartelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.