Legal Opinion

State v. Viers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 13, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery District Court. — Hon. N. W. Macy, Judge. The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of maintaining a nuisance by keeping a building for the sale of intoxicating liquors. He now appeals to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, C. J.

I. The court gave an instruction to the jury in the following language: “2. The specific i. intoxicating saii'ce?in'tent bundinlx™ iusu'uouous. offense charged against the defendant herein is that of keeping a nuisance ; that is, of keeping a building or place within -¿his county, wherein he sold, and kept with the intent to sell, intoxicating liquors, contrary to law. A building in which intoxicating liquors are in fact sold unlawfully, or in which intoxicating liquors are' kept for the purpose of sale or exchange unlawfully, is ' a nuisance, and the person who keeps a building for ■ that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TweedySupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  2. Mackie v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. Gwynn v. DuffieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. State v. HelvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. Hall & Spencer v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. CritelliSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  2. Williams v. Mineral City Park Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Bartel v. HobsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Stanley v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. State v. GoeringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API