Legal Opinion

Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. Donna E. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 10, 1997No. 18-1341PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Appellants challenge the district court’s determination that a National Academy of Sciences committee, which promulgates and revises a guide on the care and use of laboratory animals for government agencies, is not subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act because it is not “utilized” within the meaning of the statute. We reverse.

I

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS), Appellee-Intervenor, was chartered by Congress in 1863 and has a duty to, “whenever called upon by any department of the Government,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Washington Legal Foundation v. United States Sentencing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Food Chemical News v. Frank E. Young, Commissioner, Food and Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  5. Lombardo v. HandlerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Byrd v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Natural Resources Defense Council v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Energy Policy Development GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. Cummock, M. Victoria v. Gore, AlbertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  5. Natural Resources Defense Council v. AbrahamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API