Legal Opinion

Natural Resources Defense Council v. Abraham

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 30, 2002No. CIV.A.00-2431 EGSPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SULLIVAN, District Judge.

The Department of Energy (“DOE”) is currently overseeing the construction of a multi-billion dollar facility in Livermore, California named the National Ignition Facility (“NIF”). The NIF, as designed, would be used to initiate and sustain the nuclear fusion process in laboratory conditions. In theory, a fusion reaction would be produced by converging 192 lasers on a tiny fuel pellet, crushing and heating the pellet until its atoms emit nuclear energy, a process called “ignition.” See Pl.Ex. 1, at 7 (GAO Report).

The Federal Advisory Committee Act…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Save Our Springs Alliance, Inc. v. City of Dripping Springs, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  2. Dunlap v. Presidential Advisory Comm'n on Election IntegrityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Natural Resources Defense Council v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  5. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. HorinkoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API