Stack v. Stack
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCnARicsoN, J.
Tbe issues above outline and are determinative of tbe controversy.
At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence and at tbe close of all tbe evidence, tbe defendant Commissioner of Banks, made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. Tbe motions were overruled and in tbis we see no error.
*466We think that all the exceptions and assignments of error made by the defendant Commissioner of Banks can be considered under the one made above to the signing of the judgment in this action., and in this respect we can see no error .on the record.
We think the main question of law involved in this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Typewriter Co. v. . Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Exum v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Hite v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Roebuck v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Hill v. Star Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- BORDEN, INCORPORATED v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Kindler v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Camargo Cadillac Co. v. Garfield Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mozingo v. North Carolina National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Bank of Chapel Hill v. RosensteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.