Legal Opinion

McNamara v. Cornell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1989No. 55968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John V. Corrigan, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Peter M. McNamara and his father, John McNamara (“appellants”), appeal from the trial court’s granting of defendant-appellee Linda A. Cornell’s supplemental motion for summary judgment. The facts giving rise to the instant appeal are as follows:

Appellee was the owner of a suburban residence in the city of Bay Village. In the house garage, a skateboard bowl had been constructed by her son, Tom Beercheck, and a friend of his. The skateboard bowl was a U-shaped bowl 12 feet wide, 4 feet high, tapering down to 2V2 feet. It was constructed of plywood…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hounshell v. American States InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Williams v. First United Church of ChristOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Wills v. Frank Hoover SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Miller v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Loyer v. BuchholzOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perrine v. Kennecott Mining Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Opheim v. City of LorainOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API