Legal Opinion
The Maytag Company, a Corporation v. The Murray Corporation of America, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1963No. 14728_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CECIL, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant, The Maytag Company, brought this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, against the defendant-appellee, The Murray Corporation of America, for infringement of a patent. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively.
The patent in question, No. 2,717,456, was issued to Thomas R. Smith .and assigned by him to the plaintiff. The defendant denied infringement and charged that the patent was invalid. The District Judge found the patent to be valid, except for claim 15…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Fmc Corporation v. The F. E. Myers & Bro. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- M. O. S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.