Legal Opinion

Glass v. Kenney

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2004No. S-03-036, S-03-128PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Cases Nos. S-03-128 and S-03-036 have been consolidated on appeal. In each case, we are asked to determine whether the district court erred in denying the motion of appellant, Greg A. Glass, to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that the district court erred when it denied Glass’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in case No. S-03-128 and that it did not err when it denied Glass’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis with his habeas corpus action at the trial level in case No. S-03-036.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

In 1999, Glass was convicted by a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CaddyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Arthur v. Microsoft Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Flora Ex Rel. Flora v. EscuderoNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re Interest of Noelle F.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State on behalf of Jakai C. v. Tiffany M.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. County of LancasterNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re Interest of Fedalina G.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Mumin v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API