Legal Opinion

In Re Interest of Noelle F.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1996No. S-94-842, S-94-843PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The appellant, Donald F., has petitioned this court for further review of the decision of the Nebraska Court of Appeals, which dismissed his appeals for lack of jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ruling that Donald should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis, and the Court of Appeals dismissed Donald’s appeals because he had failed to pay the required docket fees. We granted Donald’s petition for further review.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

When a jurisdictional question does not involve a factual dispute, its determination is a matter of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flora Ex Rel. Flora v. EscuderoNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Payne v. Nebraska Department of Correctional ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. SchmailzlNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. EberhardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. HaaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of JoshuaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. ParmarNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. DallmannNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. City of Lincoln v. Twin Platte Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Glass v. KenneyNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API