Legal Opinion

Feld v. Robert & Charles Beauty Salon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1990No. Docket No. 85392PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, C.J.

We granted leave to appeal in this case to decide whether an employee has the right to have counsel present at a physical examination requested by an employer or its insurance carrier pursuant to § 3851 of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act,2 and if so, whether counsel may make an audio recording of the examination.

MCL 418.385; MSA 17.237(385) provides that "[t]he employee shall have the right to have a physician provided and paid for by himself or herself present at the examination.” However, § 385 is silent as to whether an employee has the right to have an attorney present during the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Storey v. Meijer, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Pittsfield Charter Township v. Washtenaw CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Murphy v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API