Legal Opinion

United Motor San Francisco Co. v. Callander

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1916No. Civ. No. 1371PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San 'Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. C. W. Norton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Plaintiff brought the action to recover upon a promissory note executed by defendants at the town of Manteca, San Joaquin County, December 23, 1911, for the sum of six hundred dollars, with interest at seven per cent per annum, principal due thirty days after date. Where in this opinion we use the singular number for one of the defendants, reference will be to defendant W. C. Callander.

In their answer defendants admit the execution of the promissory note, and as defense thereto alleged that “on or about December 23, 1911, plaintiff and defendant W. C. Cal-lander entered into a contract…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Oppenheimer v. ClunieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Cream City Glass Co. v. FriedlanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Marten v. Paul O. Burns Wine Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Noll v. BaidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Knight v. BentelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API