Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Detroit Operating Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931No. Docket No. 98, Calendar No. 35,829PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

Joseph L. Scarborough, plaintiff and appellee, purchased on a conditional sale contract an automobile from the Detroit Cab Company, which assigned its interest to the Detroit Operating Company. The two companies are defendants and appellants. The purchase price was $1,323.96, of which $195 was paid in cash and the balance, payable in monthly installments of $94.08, was evidenced by notes. The contract contained an agreement by vendee that the automobile would be kept at the cab company’s garage, and also other covenants vouchsafing the proper conduct of the vendee, the careful use of the car,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ittleson v. HaganMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kimber v. EdingMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Elizabeth A. Dodson and Edward L. Dodson v. Imperial Motors, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Stewart R. DevriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  3. Jensen v. WrothNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Kruse v. CareyMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Fullwood v. CatsmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API