Legal Opinion
Government Employees Insurance v. Chahalis
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 1972PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harriett, J.
This proceeding presents the question of whether a homeowner’s insurance policy provides coverage for injuries resulting from a collision away from the home involving an automobile owned and operated by the insured’s minor son. On May 22, 1971, Gary Chahalis, an infant under-21 years of age, driving his own car, collided with an automobile carrying Rudolph and Emma Bonapace. Having brought suit against both Chahalis, the Bonapaces collected the maximum amount payable under the automobile liability policy and gave a conditional release to the son. Upon the Bonapaces pressing their further…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Steinberg v. CauchoisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Kuchlik v. FeuerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Kuchlik v. Feuer, FeuerNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cooter v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. McGlawnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Rubins Contractors, Inc., a Maryland Corporation v. Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company, General Accident Insurance Company of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Standard Mutual Insurance Company v. Elodie L. Bailey, Charlotte A. Cook, Charles E. Cook and Christopher J. CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Huggins v. Tri-County Bonding Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.