Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. Cauchois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1937PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

The action is by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries and by her father to recover for loss of her services. The infant plaintiff, while walking on the sidewalk of a public highway, was injured by being struck by a bicycle operated on that sidewalk by the infant defendant in .violation of a municipal ordinance. The complaint in effect alleged negligence (1) of the infant defendant in such operation of the bicycle, and (2) of the adult defendants, respectively his father and mother, in that they knowingly permitted him to operate his bicycle in a careless, negligent and reckless…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schultz v. MorrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Tifft v. TifftNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. McCarthy v. HeiselmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Frellesen v. Colburn, New York County Courts1935

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Lalomia v. Bankers & Shippers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. Maurillo v. Park Slope U-HaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Comeau v. LucasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API