Legal Opinion

Application of Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1958No. 34323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company commenced this proceeding before the Nebraska State Railway Commission to secure permission to discontinue motor passenger trains Nos. 15 and 16, which are operated daily, between Wymore and Oxford, Nebraska, except Sunday from Wymore and Monday from Oxford. Objections were filed by Ted Burgess as the representative of the towns located on the line of railroad on which trains Nos. 15 and 16 are presently operating. The commission, after a public hearing, denied the. application, and the railroad company has appealed.

There are 23 communities…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Municipalities of HoldregeNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Save the Trains Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of AllianceNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API