Legal Opinion
Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Riverside Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff alleged and the defendant by answer admitted that on December 26th, 1930, Angelo Sissa had on deposit with the defendant $2221.64 and on that date executed an assignment in writing, upon sufficient consideration, to the plaintiff, a copy of which assignment was presented the same day to the treasurer of the defendant, who endorsed thereon the following: “Dec. 26, 1930. Received and filed copy of above. Riverside Trust Company, Hartford, Conn. W. O. Eitel, Treas.” On December 19th, 1932, the plaintiff being still the holder of the assignment, made written demand upon the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jordan v. . National Shoe and Leather BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Hewitt's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Harral v. LevertySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Riverside Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- First Connecticut Small Business Investment Co. v. Bank of Boston Connecticut (In Re First Connecticut Small Business Investment Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
- General Consolidated, Ltd. v. Rudnick & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- Briley v. Board of Supervisors of Story CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.