Legal Opinion
Keith v. Fountain
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 3, 1893No. 171PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEY, Associate Justice.
Appellee instituted this suit in a Justice Court for the recovery of $150 for an alleged breach on the part of appellant of the following written contract:
“ State of Texas, County of Atascosa.—Know all men by these presents, that I, W. H. Fountain, have this day agreed with B. E. Keith to establish for him lines around 80 acres at least, or 160 acres if to be found, of vacant land; to well establish all adjoining lines of surrounding surveys so that the land may be well described for investigation at the General Land Office, and furnish all necessary papers pertaining…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Shelton v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Read v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Heirs of Hunt v. Heirs of RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- State v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Mullin v. Nash-El Paso Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Osage Oil & Gas Co. v. CaulkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Dodson v. McCurninSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Ayub v. SalomanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.