Legal Opinion

Read v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1883No. Case No. 1401PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Navarro. Tried below before the Hon. L. D. Bradley. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

The petition in effect alleged that about October 1, 1876, the appellee entered into a verbal agreement of partnership with the firm of H. A. Wood & Co., the object and *380purpose of which was to deal in county scrip of Washington county, each party to furnish an equal amount of capital and divide the profits. It further alleged that in pursuance of that agreement the appellee paid to Wood & Co. $1,600, which was invested in county scrip of Washington county, and for the value of one-half of the county scrip bought by the partnership, and undisposed of on the 3d of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bartle v. NuttSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Shelton v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Hanauer v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Kenerson v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Anderson v. PowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hall v. EdwardsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Wiggins v. BissoTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Stone v. RobinsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Crutchfield v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Norman v. B. v. Christie & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API