Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williams v. Bailey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1915No. Docket No. 88PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to Macomb; Tucker, J. The will of Lydia Bailey, deceased, was admitted to probate and Stephen Bailey, contestant, appealed to circuit court. Judgment for contestant; proponent brings error.

1DissentBird, J.

The paper offered as the last will and testament of Lydia Bailey was set aside in the Macomb circuit court by a jury on the grounds of defective execution and undue influence. The testatrix was a maiden lady, who resided at Romeo. Her nearest of kin was a brother, Stephen Bailey. The value of her estate was nearly .$8,000, and consisted mostly of real property. In August, 1905, she made a will and devised in trust the bulk of her estate to the Bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the diocese of Michigan, for the use of such church in the village of Romeo. In November, 1909, she added…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Beaubien v. CicotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Rivard v. RivardMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Wallace v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Dudley v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Meier v. BuchterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Kar v. HoganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. McGuire v. RabautMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Straith v. StraithMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Cochrane v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API