Legal Opinion

Cochrane v. King

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1920No. Docket No. 46PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to Lapeer; Williams (William B.), J. David Cochrane and others presented for probate the last will of William Cochrane, deceased. The will was disallowed in the probate court, and proponents appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for proponents on a directed verdict. William King, contestant, brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

William Cochrane was a resident of Lapeer county all his life. He had been married but his wife died some two dr three years after their marriage, leaving no children. He lived oh, and worked his father’s farm where he was born, about two and one-half miles from Almont, until his father’s death when he bought out the other heirs and continued on the place. He was a successful farmer, a director in *372the bank at Almont, had accumulated considerable personal property in addition to his real estate, and left an estate of upwards of $52,000. He was 68 years old when he died. He had been ailing for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gillett v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. McKeand v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Pierce v. PierceMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Blackman v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Severance v. SeveranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Jennings'estateMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re Cottrell's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Krisher v. DuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. American Insurance v. MartinekMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. In Re Lembrich's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API