Crouch v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellant filed a petition for statutory special action asserting that the City of Tucson has allowed a franchise to exist, “de facto or otherwise,” in favor of Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company without submitting the franchise to the electorate of the City of Tucson, 1 and requested a writ of mandamus requiring the city to submit the franchise to the electorate of the city at the next general election for their approval or disapproval. The city answered and the telephone company intervened and filed a motion to dismiss which was granted. This appeal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. SULLIVAN v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Skinner v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Faulkner v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. BoehringerArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Sawyer v. LaSotaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Webb v. CianciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
- Jennings v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Blankenbaker v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- City of Bisbee v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Kord's Ambulance Service, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.