State v. Tucker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for robbery in the second degree, ORS 164.405, burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, burglary in the second degree, ORS 164.215, and aggravated theft in the first degree, ORS 164.057. On appeal, defendant raises three assignments of error. First, he asserts that the trial court erred in giving a “natural and probable consequences” jury instruction addressing accomplice liability. Second, defendant contends that, because he was not “actually present” when the robbery took place, he could be convicted, at most, of only third-degree robbery and that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Koennecke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. Lopez-MinjarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Maas v. WillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. FernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. KeeganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026