Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 24, 2013No. D100319M; A146396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

In this criminal case, defendant appeals a judgment convicting her of seven misdemeanors, all of which arose from a traffic accident. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in giving a jury instruction regarding the duties of a driver and in failing to clarify the instruction. She argues that the instruction was improper and its use created a likelihood that the jury would convict her of the six charged crimes that required recklessness even if it found that she acted with a less-than-reckless mental state. We affirm.

Defendant’s charges arose from a traffic accident that took place at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BowenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Maas v. WillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Morehouse v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. S. N. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. May v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. MartschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. RossiterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API