State v. Clark
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
In this criminal case, defendant appeals a judgment convicting her of seven misdemeanors, all of which arose from a traffic accident. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in giving a jury instruction regarding the duties of a driver and in failing to clarify the instruction. She argues that the instruction was improper and its use created a likelihood that the jury would convict her of the six charged crimes that required recklessness even if it found that she acted with a less-than-reckless mental state. We affirm.
Defendant’s charges arose from a traffic accident that took place at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BowenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Maas v. WillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Morehouse v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. S. N. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- May v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. MartschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. RossiterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019