Legal Opinion

Koennecke v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 28, 1993No. C910879CV; CA A76059PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*102EDMONDS, J.

Petitioner appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief.1 ORS 138.510 et seq. He seeks to set aside his conviction for menacing, ORS 163.190, on the ground that his rights under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution were denied. He argues that the post-conviction court erred in refusing to allow him to subpoena the jurors who returned the guilty verdict and in declining to consider hearsay testimony of alleged juror misconduct. We affirm.

Shortly after his trial on the menacing charge, a coworker…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. MendezOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Barnes v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Pinnell v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API