United States v. MacAndrews & Forbes Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
On Defendants’:..Motion in .Arrest of Judgment and to Set Aside ' the Verdict. ■ '.....•
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
The indictment which was considered off demurrer in opinion filed herein December 3, 1906 (149 Fed. 823), having come on for trial, and resulted in a verdict of guilty against' the corporate defendants upon the first and third counts only — i. e,, those for combination and monopoly under the Sherman anti-trust law (Act July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3200]) — motion is now made to set aside the verdict upon numerous-grounds, as to all which except one I have in the opinion referred to expressed my views, and to those views I adhere.
It is now…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gully v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Polinsky v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Commonwealth v. TenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- United States v. MacAndrews & Forbes Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
- People v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Pullman Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
- People v. Sacramento Butchers' Protective Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.