Legal Opinion

United States v. Pullman Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1943No. Civil Action 994PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is a proceeding brought by the United States to restrain alleged violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and § 3 of the Clayton Act. The principal corporate defendants are the Pullman Company, the Pullman-Standard Car Manufacturing Company and Pullman, Inc. A description of the corporate defendants and the relation of the individual defendants therewith are found in the stipulation of facts entered into between the parties, found as facts by the Court. They need not be repeated here.

The Pullman Company is today, and has been since 1900, except for railroads…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Hartford-Empire Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. The Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc., D/B/A Holiday Inn-Superdome v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  5. Hiland Dairy, Inc., Reiss Dairy, Inc., and Sunny Hill Farms Dairy Company, Inc. v. The Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API