Legal Opinion

State v. Bohner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1933PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 10, 1933 :

Wickhem, J.

No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence, nor do either of the legal questions involved in this appeal require a consideration of the facts concerning the robbery and defendant’s connection with it. The first contention of the defendant is that the court erred in trying the case in the circuit court before a circuit court jury. At the preliminary hearing defendant was bound over to the county court of Monroe county. On January 4, 1932, an affidavit was filed by defendant, setting forth that “he has good reason to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Fordyce v. State ex rel. KelleherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hewitt v. FollettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. French v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Fatt v. FattWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. BiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State v. StanislawskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API