Legal Opinion

Rangel v. Parkhurst

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 24, 2001No. AC 20426PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The plaintiff Yaroslava Rangel1 appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the *374defendants, Douglas Parkhurst and Judy Parkhurst.2 On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the trial court improperly (1) granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the basis of its finding that the defendants were neither purveyors nor servers of alcohol to a minor and (2) determined that, as a matter of law, parents who know of and acquiesce in their minor child’s storage of alcoholic beverages in their home are not liable for damages subsequently caused by the intoxicated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. 2830 Whitney Avenue Corp. v. Heritage Canal Development Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Bohan v. LastSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shea v. MatassaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. Vitale v. KowalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Contadini v. DevitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. McAuley v. Southington Savings BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Pawlowski v. Delta Sigma Phi Fraternity, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API