Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Hynds

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1944No. Criminal No. 944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCINI, Superior Judge.

D. S. Hynds, the appellant in this ease, was defendant below. He was charged with practicing chiropody in Gila County, Arizona, without first procuring a license as provided by Chapter 112, Session Laws of 1941. He was found guilty in the Justice Court, appealed his case to the Superior Court, was found guilty there and is here on the following assignments of error:

1. That the court below erred in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss.

2. That the court erred in denying the motion asking for the names of witnesses on the ground that it was not presented seasonably.

3.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. BenhamArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Buehman v. BechtelArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Aztec Land and Cattle Co. v. Navajo Realty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WakeenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lucas v. Maine Commission of PharmacySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. State v. GeeArizona Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API