Legal Opinion
Buehman v. Bechtel
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1941No. Civil No. 4373PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This action was brought by Orville W. Bechtel against the Board of Examiners in Photography, consisting of A. R. Buehman, Marvin Irwin, Mary Kelly, Tom Bate and Floyd Getsinger, to secure a declaratory judgment as to the constitutional validity of' Chapter 31, Laws of 1935, secs. 67-1601 to 67-1615, Arizona Code, 1939. It is claimed that such act is in conflict with and repugnant to the due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and to section 4, Article II of the state Constitution, prohibiting the deprivation of life, liberty or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Ribnik v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. CromwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- United Interchange, Inc. v. SpellacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.