Legal Opinion

State v. Gee

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1951No. 1001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Justice.

This case has been certified to us by the Honorable Dudley W. Windes, Judge of the Superior Court of Maricopa County, under provisions of section 44-2401, A.C.A.1939.

An information filed against defendant charged in one count that he practiced chiropractic without having first obtained a license to so do from the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, and the second count charged him with the crime of practicing healing without a valid certificate in basic sciences.

The facts in the case were stipulated between the state and defendant. The following stipulated facts are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Batty v. Arizona State Dental BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Dennis v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Board of Technical Registration v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Arizona State Board of Medical Examiners v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. 3613 Ltd. v. Department of Liquor Licenses & ControlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Cohen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Cohen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API