Stewarts' Pharmacies, Ltd. v. Fase
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
MARUMOTO, J.
We have before us two submissions on agreed facts by the same parties involving a single question of law as to whether the Compensating Tax Law, R.L.H. 1955, Ch. 118, is valid under the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States.
*132The parties have agreed to the following facts:
1. Taxpayer is a retailer licensed under the General Excise Tax Law, R.L.H. 1955, Ch. 117. It owns and operates in Honolulu a number of stores at which it sells drugs and other merchandise to consumers. It obtains the merchandise which it sells from four sources, namely:
A.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MedeirosHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Matter of Puna Sugar Company, LimitedHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- In re the Tax Appeal of Otis Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1977