Legal Opinion

Stewarts' Pharmacies, Ltd. v. Fase

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1959No. Nos. 4040 and 4041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MARUMOTO, J.

We have before us two submissions on agreed facts by the same parties involving a single question of law as to whether the Compensating Tax Law, R.L.H. 1955, Ch. 118, is valid under the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States.

*132The parties have agreed to the following facts:

1. Taxpayer is a retailer licensed under the General Excise Tax Law, R.L.H. 1955, Ch. 117. It owns and operates in Honolulu a number of stores at which it sells drugs and other merchandise to consumers. It obtains the merchandise which it sells from four sources, namely:

A.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MedeirosHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Matter of Puna Sugar Company, LimitedHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In re the Tax Appeal of Otis Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API