Legal Opinion

Jocque v. McRae

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1905No. Docket No. 132PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Delta; Stone, J. Assumpsit by Henry Jocque against Peter McRae upon a certain check. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The opinion of the trial judge so fully, clearly, and correctly disposes of the sole question involved in this case that we adopt it as our own without further comment, as follows:

“This action was brought to recover the amount claimed to. be due upon a certain check or order for the payment of money, a copy of which was set forth in the declaration, as follows:
“ ‘Esoanaba, Mich., 17th Sept., 1896.

»* No. 783.

“ ‘ The First National Bank. Ninety days after date pay Henry Jocque or bearer, 5775.00. Seven hundred and Seventy-five dollars. Pine purchase.
“ ‘ J. L. MoRae & Co., Dec. 16.’
*371“ The sole…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warren v. SladeMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. People ex rel. Chaddock v. BarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Gorham v. WingMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Shelton v. GillettMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Wiesinger v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Smith v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Collateral Liquidation, Inc. v. PalmMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Dykema v. Story & Clark Piano Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Schram v. Checker Service Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API