Schram v. Checker Service Corp.

PICARD, District Judge.

Findings of Facts.

The facts in the above entitled case are ■ not disputed. Action is brought by the Receiver on three promissory notes, for two of which counsel admits there is no defense. It is the third note that is in dispute.

The Receiver instituted suit on February 27, 1939. It appears that the third note, the one in question, was dated, December 27, 1932, payable in sixty days thereafter or February 25, 1933, which came on Saturday. Plaintiff claims that under the laws of the State of Michigan, a note falling due on Saturday is payable on the next succeeding…