Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Chaddock v. Barry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1892PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Missaukee. (Aldrich, J.) Debt. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This cause was tried in the circuit court before a jury. The suit was on a sheriff’s bond; but the only question in controversy here is upon a justice’s summons, which was introduced in evidence, and upon which the rights of the parties depend. The summons was issued February 9, 1889, returnable February 18. It was served upon one of the defendants in the summons named, February 13. It is claimed upon the part of the defendants that both the day of service and the return-day should be excluded, and that, so excluding both days, no *543sufficient service was had to give the justice jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arnold v. NyeMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Columbia Turnpike Road v. HaywoodNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  3. Small v. EdrickNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Sallee v. IrelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Town v. TaborMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Aultman Taylor Co. v. . SymeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Soutar v. St. Clair County Election CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. St. George v. Justice CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. First Bank of Cadillac v. BensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. In Re Esterly's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API