Legal Opinion

Blake v. Grondin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1905No. Docket No. 82PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Schoolcraft; Steere, J. Trespass by Richard Blake against Edward A. Grondin under 3 Comp. Laws, § 11204. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit under the statute authorizing treble damages for trespass, and recovered a judgment in the court below. The facts are as follows:

The trespass consisted in cutting timber on certain land. The original owners of the land were the trustees of the estate of Francis Palms, deceased. The taxes assessed against the land had not been paid for several years. The land had been sold for the nonpayment of said taxes and bid off to the State, and at the time of the alleged trespass the time for redemption had expired. After the trespass was committed, defendant purchased the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huron Land Co. v. RobargeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hickey v. RutledgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. DoctorMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. White v. DunsmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Morse v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Griffin v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API