Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Rutledge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1904No. Docket No. 87PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Case made from Roscommon; Sharpe, J. Replevin by George Hickey against Homer Rutledge. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is replevin brought by a purchaser of State tax land against a State trespass agent for ties cut from such land while the title remained in the State. The ties were cut by plaintiff, who entered before purchase. The contention of the defendant was that, upon a severance, the timber became personal property, belonging to the State, and that, as a consequence, the subsequent sale to the plaintiff of the State’s title to the land did not vest in the plaintiff title to the severed timber. The ‘circuit court held otherwise.

The regularity of the proceedings' by which the title to the land in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Robbins v. BarronMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Allen v. CowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Griffin v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Jacobsen v. NieboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Grand Rapids Trust Co. v. DoctorMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. White v. DunsmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Morse v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API