Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Sugarman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 15, 1972No. 71 Civ. 1719PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

MOTLEY, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in this action are all recipients of public assistance from the State of New York under federally-funded programs, The complaint, as amended on May 24, 1971, charges defendants Sugarman and the New York City Department of Social Services with violating the mandate of Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 90 S.Ct. 1011, 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970), in their refusal to abide by and in their attempts to review ex parte certain “fair hearing” decisions of the New York State Department of

Social Services involving the proposed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Almenares v. WymanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Serritella v. EngelmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Allen v. State of West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Shands v. TullCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Hospital Center at Orange v. GuhlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Liability Investigative Fund Effort, Inc. v. Massachusetts Medical Professional InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Andujar v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API